Sometimes it is hard to know where to draw a line in the sand.

It used to be so simple. It used to be so easy. I would be ambling along, see something, think ‘that’s a nice shot’, and then point and shoot my point and shoot. If I got the picture I wanted then great. If not then meh. No bother.

But one day that ceased to be enough. I had hit the limitations of what I could do so blessed with the fortitude of total ignorance I left my trusty point and shoot behind and took the step up to the next level and what a murky and unforgiving place it has turned out to be.

As I peeled back the layers of understanding any belief in myself or my ability was slashed away like virgin forest under a chain saw. It very quickly became apparent that I knew nothing and just about every photo I had ever taken was worthless. Numbers and jargon towered round me like an impenetrable jungle, focal lengths and ISO numbers would loom out of the shadows leering at me and the nagging doubt that I should be shooting film buzzed around me head like a swarm of obsolete mosquitoes.

But worse was yet to come, a clawing, corrosive uncertainty that threatened to destroy my very faith in the art of photography and it can be summed up in a very simple question: What is a photograph?

Well ‘duh!’ I hear you cry, it is a picture of something. Easy. But it isn’t, is it? Just about every photo you and I have ever seen has undergone some form of post processing. And if photo is meant to be ‘of something’ but that image has been manipulated then it ceases to be a representation of what was photographed but becomes what the photographer wishes had been photographed.

And that is cheating.

And not the good sort of cheating either, no, this is the bad sort that distorts reality and makes a mockery of life and nature. Is it not enough to see that the garden is beautiful without having to Photoshop in fairies as well?

So today I slay this personal demon before it consumes me. I herby promise you that any shot of mine you may see herein is as close to possible the original shot. I reserve the right to, as Nat Geo put it, “[adjust] the basics needed to achieve realistic colour balance and sharpness” but more than that I shall not. And so help me God if I ever touch a HDR shot I give you all the right to hunt me down and insert any 3 pieces of my camera equipment in any orifices of your choice.

I will insert one caveat at the end though. I am not discounting all heavily processed works, indeed there are some fantastic images out there that owe everything to Photoshop but I see them as works of art closer to a painting than a photograph. After all, being a great photoshoper is not the same as being a great photographer.


4 Responses to “Sometimes it is hard to know where to draw a line in the sand.”

  1. Anon says:

    Photographs are lies. One cannot see the truth in something in which it is pulled completely from it’s context, this is the medium’s power. Some art forms strive to be as close to reality as possible, while with photography we strive, or should strive, to work the other way.
    As a fact, you can state that photography is the manipulation of reality. Therefor argueing if a photo is truthful and honest because of it’s lack of post-processing is a null discussion, there might not be post-processing, but there is processing. Does it truly matter when one applies such processing? Would it be more truthful to dress your kids up as fairies in front of your camera, then to shoot them dressed up in your studio, only to add them later? Is a painting more thruthful when it is painted on the spot, instead of sketched and finalized at home?
    The answer returns to the question wether anything else matters besides the final result.
    Does the art reside in the final presented images, or in the creational process where one works with the camera? Does it matter if next year’s world press photo was created on M or on full auto?
    Personally, I’d vouch for the former.

    tl;dr: Who gives a fuck, as long as you enjoy yourself.

  2. XX says:

    To massively adjust an image, belittles the truth this medium grants us above all others. I’ll give you that.

    But in saying that, to blindly go with what comes out of the usb cable/fixer is you agreeing 100% to what the engineers at Nikon, Kodak, Ilford etc are saying your images should look like.

  3. Wow, thanks for the input. It has all got a bit philosophical but that’s cool!

  4. Marcos Bussy says:

    Sick and tired of obtaining low numbers of useless traffic to your site? Well i wish to tell you about a brand new underground tactic which makes myself $900 daily on 100% AUTOPILOT. I could be here all day and going into detail but why dont you just check their website out? There is really a excellent video that explains everything. So if your serious about making hassle-free cash this is the website for you. Auto Traffic Avalanche

Leave a Reply

comments-bottom

Featured Photos

Norway…. Posted by author icon Adrian Jun 18th, 2010 | one response
Some things….. Posted by author icon Adrian Jun 18th, 2010 | no responses
Heading north. Posted by author icon Adrian Jun 17th, 2010 | no responses

Random Photos

Kinder Reservoir at ... Posted by author icon Adrian Feb 3rd, 2010 | no responses
The Scream Posted by author icon Adrian Mar 8th, 2010 | no responses
New Mills Display Posted by author icon Adrian Feb 1st, 2010 | no responses

Top Rated

Macclesfield Forest ... Posted by author icon Adrian
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (6 votes - 5.00 / 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
The Pantanal Bird Li... Posted by author icon Adrian
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes - 5.00 / 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
Iguaçu Posted by author icon Adrian
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes - 5.00 / 5)
Loading ... Loading ...